... now with 35% more arrogance!

Monday, May 3, 2010

Dwarves III

It occurs to me that there's another way of handling the "earth sense" for revamped, stripped-down dwarven race, one that doesn't require any of the balancing acts (level limits, experience point surcharges) suggested in the stripped-down fantasy races post. Furthermore, it fits the "general power/scaled power" template from the stripped-down classes without awarding non-humans bonus powers, and keeps things simple.

Race as class.

No, not the way it's done in BD&D. Rather, if you play a dwarf, you replace your class's general power with earth sense. You now know which way magnetic north is and can sense your depth underground, no chance of failure under normal circumstances (a loadstone might interfere with sensing north.) No need for level limits, class restrictions (except for setting purposes,) or disadvantages. Dwarves also get physical description labels of Short and Stout, which are "self-balancing" (drawback in some situations, benefit in others.) The rest is handled by cultural background.

I think in general this is a good, simple way to handle classes. Some races may optionally have additional powers, but these would be coupled with drawbacks of some kind.

2 comments:

  1. I like this! So simple I am surprised I didn't think of it (considering I am simple, or so my colleges say)

    Would you restrict such Races to only replacing the 'general' power, and not the 'scaling' power? Or maybe both? Such as taking the 'earth sense' and replacing the cleaving (don't remember the exact example you gave a few posts back) through 1hd & less? Say for a Dwarven Fighter?

    Again, thanks for sharing.
    TB

    ReplyDelete
  2. The rule's the same as for variant classes: replacements must be of the same type. General for general, scaled for scaled. Racial powers aren't optional, so a race with both a general power and a scaled power is basically a variant class that can't be hybridized -- in other words, true "race as class". Mixing scaled powers seems reasonable, though.

    ReplyDelete